basal body temperature as method of natural family planning
Last reviewed 01/2018
Basal Body Termperature
- basal body temperature (BBT) elevation retrospectively identifies fertility
- luteinizing hormone surge, which stimulates ovulation, is associated with a 0.5- to 1°F- (0.9- to 1.8°C) rise in BBT measured with highly standardized methods (1)
- BBT can be taken orally, vaginally, or rectally with a sensitive thermometer
- same site should be used daily
- BBT
- measured on awakening at approximately the same time every morning,
before getting out of bed or doing any other activity
- at least 6 hours of uninterrupted sleep the preceding night is necessary for accurate measurement
- remains elevated throughout the luteal phase secondary to higher progesterone levels
- woman assumed to have ovulated after observing 3 consecutive days of temperature elevation
- pregnancy is avoided by abstaining from the beginning of menstruation
until 3 to 4 days after the rise in BBT
- all subsequent days until the beginning of her next menses are considered
infertile
- because sperm survive 5 days, BBT alone does not predict ovulation far enough in advance to identify all the potentially fertile days; it predicts only peak fertility, so thus the need to abstain from the beginning of menstruation (1)
- all subsequent days until the beginning of her next menses are considered
infertile
- many other factors also limit the use of BBT
- some women ovulate without a clear rise in BBT
- inaccurate basal temperature measurement can be caused by alcohol consumption, late nights or oversleeping, disrupted sleep, travel, time zone differences, holidays, shift work, stress, illness, gynecologic disorders and medications
- biphasic shift of BBT has been found to vary up to 1 day before and 3 days after actual ovulation
- measured on awakening at approximately the same time every morning,
before getting out of bed or doing any other activity
Reference:
- 1) Pallone SR, Bergus GR.Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):147-57.
- 2) Evans C.Natural family planning is effective and culturally acceptable.BMJ. 2012 Jul 23;345
- 3) Freundl G et al.State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: IV. Natural family planning. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010 Apr;15(2):113-23