Reese - Ellsworth classification for intraocular tumours
Last reviewed 01/2018
Developed in the 1960s this classification isused when surgery and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were the primary treatment options (1).
- is used to predict the outcome in patients who were treated with EBRT (2)
- this system is based on number, size and location of tumours and the presence of vitreous seeding (1)
The classification system has five groups:
- Group I: very favourable prognosis
- A: Solitary tumour, smaller than 4 disc diameters in size, at or behind the equator
- B: Multiple tumours, none greater than 4 disc diameters in size, all at
or behind the equator
- Group II: favourable prognosis
- A: Solitary tumour, 4–10 disc diameters in size, at or behind the equator
- B: Multiple tumours, 4–10 disc diameters in size, all at or behind
the equator
- Group III: doubtful prognosis
- A: Any lesion anterior to the equator
- B: Solitary tumour, larger than 10 disc diameter, behind the equator
- Group IV: unfavourable prognosis
- A: Multiple tumours, some greater than 10 disc diameters
- B: Any lesion extending anteriorly to the ora serrata
- Group V: very unfavourable prognosis
- A: Massive tumours involving more than half of the retina
- B: Vitreous seeding (3)
With the introduction of newer treatment modalities (e.g. - chemotherapy) which have replaced EBRT, the usefulness of this classification system is less apparent (2).
Reference:
- (1) National Cancer Institute 2012. Retinoblastoma treatment
- (2) Chintagumpala M et al. Retinoblastoma: review of current management. Oncologist. 2007;12(10):1237-46
- (3) McDaid C et al. Systematic review of effectiveness of different treatments for childhood retinoblastoma. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(48):iii, ix-x, 1-145.