Hill-Sachs lesion
Last edited 06/2020
Hill-Sachs lesion and Bankart lesion (1):
- common sequelae to recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint
- Hill-Sachs lesion
- is a compression fracture of the posterolateral humeral head due to its compression against the anteroinferior part of the glenoid when the humerus is anteriorly dislocated
- the anatomical apposition gives a characteristic position of the lesion; the comparable injury caused by posterior dislocation is a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion
- Bankart lesion
- commonly seen in patients with an anterior shoulder dislocation
- defined as a detachment of the anetroinferior labrum associated with a glenoid rim fracture
- may occur as an isolated injury to the labrum, or it can extend to the bony glenoid margin, where it is called a "bony Bankart"
- in most cases, both findings are associated together
- first anatomic description of the traumatic notch on the humeral head was made in 1855 by Malgaigne (2)
- in 1940 two radiologists, Harold Arthur Hill and Maurice David Sachs, published a paper, in which they made the radiographic description of lesion, naming it Hill–Sachs lesion (HSL)
- later on the glenoid rim lesions were reported (2)
- HSL is often linked with recurrent anterior shoulder instability
- demonstrated in 67–93% of anterior dislocations and can reach an incidence rate of 100% in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability (3)
- typically occurs with an anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocation event
- young age and hyperlaxity of the ligaments surrounding the glenohumeral joint lead to a predisposition for recurrence of dislocation
- most common method of
determining the HSL is the Calandra classification, which uses arthroscopy to measure the depth
of the lesion
-
Grade Description I Defect in articular surface that does not affect subchondral bone II Defect includes subchondral bone II - Large defect in the subchondral bone
- quantifying bone loss is of utmost importance to
decide the best treatment for recurrent anterior glenohumeral
instability patients (3)
- this is the determinant factor influencing the choice of the surgical technique: soft tissue procedure or bone block procedure
- has been extensively reported in the literature that the limit of glenoid bone loss above which an arthroscopic Bankart repair may fail is >= 25% of the glenoid width
- this percentage is equivalent to >= 20% of the surface area created by a bestfit circle on the inferior surface of the glenoid
- 3DCT has become the “gold standard” for Hill-Sachs imaging; however, it has been noted that 3D-MRI produces results that are not significantly different from CT (4)
Reference:
- Radiopaedia. Hill-Sachs lesion with bony Bankart lesion (accessed 10/6/2020)
- Charousset C, Beauthier V, Bellaïche L, et al. Can we improve radiological analysis of osseous lesions in chronic anterior shoulder instability? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:S88–S93.
- Maio M et al. How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:151-157.
- Fox JK et al. Understanding the Hill-Sachs Lesion in Its Role in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2017) 10:469–479
- Shibayama K, Iwaso H. Hill-Sachs lesion classification under arthroscopic findings. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(5):888–94