beta-blockers
Last reviewed 01/2018
Beta-blockers reduce the effects of the sympathetic nervous system on the cardiovascular system.
The blockade of beta-1 adrenoreceptors is negatively chronotropic and inotropic, and delays conduction through the AV node. If beta-2 receptors are blocked then this leads to coronary and peripheral vasoconstriction. Thus drugs which are relatively specific for beta-1 receptors, "cardioselective", have been developed e.g. atenolol and metoprolol.
- there are 3 types of beta receptors
- beta 1-Adrenoceptors
- situated in the cardiac sarcolemma
- if activated, they lead to an increase in the rate and force of myocardial contraction (positive inotropic effect) by opening the calcium channels
- situated in the cardiac sarcolemma
- beta 2-Adrenoceptors
- found mainly in bronchial and vascular smooth muscles
- if activated, they cause broncho- and vaso-dilatation
- there are, however, sizable populations of beta 2-Adrenoceptors in the myocardium, of about 20%-25%, which leads to the cardiac effects of any beta2-Adrenoceptors stimulation. There is a relative up-regulation of these receptors to about 50% in heart failure
- if activated, they cause broncho- and vaso-dilatation
- found mainly in bronchial and vascular smooth muscles
- beta 3 Adrenoceptors
- the role of beta 3-Adrenoceptors in the heart is not yet fully identified
and accepted
- the role of beta 3-Adrenoceptors in the heart is not yet fully identified
and accepted
- beta 1-Adrenoceptors
- beta-blockers are classified into three generations
- the first generation agents (such as Propranolol, Sotalol, Timolol,
and Nadolol), are nonselective and block beta 1 and beta 2 receptors
- blocking beta1-receptors affects the heart rate, conduction and
contractility, while blocking beta 2-receptors, tends to cause smooth
muscle contraction, therefore, bronchospasm in predisposed individuals
- blocking beta1-receptors affects the heart rate, conduction and
contractility, while blocking beta 2-receptors, tends to cause smooth
muscle contraction, therefore, bronchospasm in predisposed individuals
- second-generation agents or the cardioselective agents (such as Atenolol,
Bisoprolol, Celiprolol, and Metoprolol)
- block beta 1-receptors in low doses but are capable of blocking
beta 2-receptors in higher doses
- selective mode of action makes the use of these agents more suitable in patients with chronic lung disease or those with insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus
- there is evidence that, in patients with COPD, cardioselective beta blockers do not change FEV1 or increase respiratory symptoms
- there is evidence that cardioselective beta blockers are >20
times more selective for ß1 than ß2 receptors and
should carry less risk of bronchoconstriction in reactive airways
disease
- cardioselectivity varies between agents with the Bisoprolol
among the most selective
- block beta 1-receptors in low doses but are capable of blocking
beta 2-receptors in higher doses
- third generation agents have vasodilatory properties
- action is either selective (Nebivolol) or nonselective (Carvidolol and Labetolol)
- vasodilatory properties are mediated either by nitric oxide release as for Nebivolol or Carvidolol or by added alpha-adrenergic blockade as in Labetolol and Carvidolol
- a third vasodilatory mechanism, as in Pindolol and Acebutolol, acts via beta 2-intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA)
- these beta-blockers therefore have the capacity to stimulate as well as to block adrenergic receptors and tend to cause less bradycardia than the other beta-blockers and may cause less coldness of the extremities
- the first generation agents (such as Propranolol, Sotalol, Timolol,
and Nadolol), are nonselective and block beta 1 and beta 2 receptors
Reference:
- Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007 December; 2(4): 535-540.
- Salpeter SR et al. Cardioselective beta-blockers in patients with reactive airway disease: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:715-25.
- Salpeter S et al. Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD003566.